Ambivalence
"This is one race of people for whom
psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever" - (Sigmund Freud - about the
Irish).
There were various reactions expressed by others when
the above quote first appeared in my printed list of Irish songs for St.
Patrick’s Day – some were outraged, while others laughed their heads off.
Possibly either reaction is understandable, or perhaps one person could
entertain both reactions at the same time. In fact, I’ve often thought that the
ability to tolerate seemingly conflicting ideas at the same time was a
peculiarly Irish phenomenon.
Professor Freud has also been quoted as saying that:
“Neurosis is the inability to tolerate ambiguity.”
I
don’t believe Freud was using “ambiguity” in a conventional American way, i.e.,
as a synonym for vagueness or uncertainty; but rather more in the sense of “the
quality of having more than one meaning,” or “capable of being understood in
more than one sense.” (New Lexicon, 1988).
That understanding of ambiguity is closer to how I mean to refer to
ambivalence, i.e., as a state where one has disparate feelings (which may or
may not be conflicting) at the same time.
In this respect, I am also proceeding from the belief that much of life, or of
our human structure, involves ambivalence.
Observably, people may seem to be functioning adequately and yet be unaware of
their ambivalence. Those feelings may instead be repressed, or subsumed in our
unconscious processes; though this does not rob them of the capacity to affect
our actions, thoughts, perceptions and emotional resiliency.
According to Daniel Siegel:
“Excessive rigidity in a state of mind leads to an inability to try new configurations and to adapt flexibly to changes in the environment.… Homeostasis is achieved at the expense of the connections with others and with primary emotional states of the self.” (1999, p. 237).
Modern analysts recognize
this inflexible pattern as part of the structure resulting from the
Narcissistic Defense, i.e., a question of what the child has learned to do with
aggressive (or other “unacceptable”) impulses mobilized in his mental
apparatus. Modern Psychoanalytic treatment seeks to restore human flexibility
and emotional resiliency through its clinical methods.
In this sense it might even be said that recognition and acceptance of
ambivalence is a good thing; or as Publius Terentius said, "I am a man: I
hold that nothing human is alien to me.”
New Lexicon Ed. (1988).
New Lexicon Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, NY, Lexicon
Publications.
Publius Terentius Afer.
(185 BC - 159 BC). (Terence). Roman Comic Dramatist.
Siegel, D. (1999). The
Developing Mind, NY, Guilford Press.
© 2006, James G. Fennessy, M.A., J.D.
Matawan, New Jersey 07747
E-mail: analyst@modernpsychoanalysis.org